Volkswagen’s next step into autonomous driving looks like it
could be disappointing. But it’s also probably the best option the German giant
has if it’s going to become a serious player in driverless technology.
The world’s largest automaker is in talks to invest in Argo
AI at a $4bn valuation, the automated car company backed by Ford,
Bloomberg News reported. The deal could be finalised in the next few months.
Argo isn’t exactly the top dog with this kind of tech.
Automotive consultant Navigant has said that its offering isn’t market-leading,
and it has a point. General Motors’ Cruise and Alphabet’s Waymo have been
at it a lot longer, and Aurora Innovation has a more accomplished
The company seems to have a valuation to match. Evercore ISI
analysts described the $4bn as “a disappointment,” with some
justification. Cruise was most recently valued at $15 billion, and start-up
Zoox at more than $3bn. Ford investors hoping to highlight the underlying value
of the business as a way to boost the parent firm’s share price will
understandably feel let down.
Late to the party
VW is something of a late arrival to the driverless party,
and it needs to secure key technology. It looks like it has had to take what it
can get. Although it has a partnership with Aurora, the prospects for
developing that significantly aren’t clear-cut – co-founder Chris Urmson seems
wary of tying his firm too firmly to any single carmaker, and has at any rate
just secured new funding from Sequoia Capital and Amazon.com.
As for the others, Cruise would probably have been too
expensive, and Waymo too risky: Honda walked away from a tie-up because of
concerns it would get little access to the valuable underlying autonomous
VW could go it alone. Indeed, it already has several
internal programmes of its own. But talent is scarce, and development is
expensive, with mid-level engineers often commanding salaries above $300 000.
Teaming up helps spread the cost, while concentrating the effort and manpower.
The good news for both VW and Ford is that, despite early
fears that Silicon Valley was going to dominate autonomous cars, the race
to master the technology is more a marathon than a sprint. It wasn’t that
long ago that there was talk that these vehicles would be hitting the roads in
2020. We’re nowhere near that point, and those expectations have been soundly
tempered. Being late to the starting line isn’t the end of the world.
And as much as Argo doesn’t have the same aura as a Cruise
or Waymo, it has advantages over much of the rest of the industry. Chief
Executive Officer Bryan Salesky was an early employee of what was then
known as the Google self-driving car project, and has now evolved into Waymo;
and Argo’s Pittsburgh headquarters means it’s well placed to hoover up top
artificial intelligence and robotics experts from Carnegie Mellon University. Its
access to talent is enviable.
The structure of the deal strengthens the case for looking
at it as a prudent move. The two firms are reportedly considering a joint
venture. That might mean that each owns 45% of the startup and the
founders and employees the remaining 10%. Therefore neither would have to
consolidate the losses into their income statement, so investors can
potentially avoid the pain suffered by their counterparts at GM,
where Cruise’s $728m loss last year dragged company-wide operating profit
VW is playing catch-up, but given how long the race has to
go, it may not really matter. And if it does follow through with an investment
in Argo, it will have taken the best opportunity available.